Do People Love Their Dogs or Cats More?

Among the simplest methods to begin a heated debate is to raise the concern of whether cats or pet dogs are much better and more satisfactory family pets. There actually is some scientific information which has actually been gathered on this problem, and it recommends that, although both pet dogs and cats offer pleasure and friendship to their people, dogs are more emotionally satisfying, and pets are likewise more widely preferred.

Confirmation that dogs are valued more than cats appears in a range of different statistics. For example, among American pet owners, dogs are required to the vet twice as often as felines (despite the fact that there is no medical validation for this difference). Moreover, the emotional financial investment that we have in pet dogs reveals up in the truth that pet dog owners are more likely than cat owners to follow their veterinarian's healthcare recommendations, and pets are most likely to receive preventative care, such as vaccinations, routine physical exams, and dental treatment. It is also the case that canines are more most likely than cats to be offered premium and organic food, and likewise are more frequently offered unique treats and gifts.

Although the data revealing that our emotional accessory to our pet dogs is greater than that to our animal felines is clear, up to now there has actually been little scientific information to respond to the question regarding why pet dogs are more valued. Nevertheless, a recent set of studies by Colleen Kirk, at the New York Institute of Technology in New York City, supplies an attempt to shed some light on this concern. The theory that she provides is an extension of a concept that has actually become popular in marketing, management, and occupational psychology and it is based upon the idea of "psychological ownership."

To put it simply, mental ownership refers to a sensation that "It's mine!" A number of studies have actually recommended that mental ownership is highly connected with emotional attachment. Simply put, we care more about the things that we feel come from us. We can develop mental ownership through 3 various routes. Sensations of ownership are produced when we have control over something, or when we have actually invested ourselves in something, or if we have actually familiarized that thing effectively.

So what does this need to say about our sensations toward pet dogs and felines? Here it appears that the greatest impact originates from that very first path leading to a sense of mental ownership-- specifically the concept of control. It is generally accepted that canines are more controllable than cats. That's why, when someone finds that it is hard to control the habits of individuals, they are apt to complain, "It's like trying to herd felines!"

Our belief about the differences in the capability of humans to manage the habits of cats and dogs has resulted in numerous popular phrases, such as: "Dogs come when they're called; cats take a message and get back to you later"; or "You can keep a pet dog, however felines keep people, because they think human beings work domestic animals"; or "A canine is a man's best friend. A feline is a feline's buddy." All such observations suggest that canines are more controllable and are more mindful to humans.

post continues after ad

Kirk believed that these behavioral distinctions might impact our sensations toward felines and pets. To study this, she performed three various experiments. In the first, she simply wanted to confirm that pets were more valued than cats, and to see whether this had any association with psychological ownership. Mental ownership was determined by concerns where the participant needed to express a viewpoint on the truthfulness of statements like: "My pet lets me remain in control," or "I feel like this is 'my' family pet." There were also concerns about how affectionate, friendly, or liking the individual's feline or dog is. If their animal required a life-saving operation, the worth put on the feline or canine was determined by how much each individual was prepared to spend on veterinary care.

The results of this very first research study were quite clear. People felt a greater degree of psychological ownership for their pets than their felines. Individuals were also happy to spend two times as much for life-saving treatment for their canine than for their feline (the average was $10,689 for canines versus $5,174 for felines).

The 2nd research study once again took a look at the concept of control, however likewise included a 2nd factor, specifically the individual financial investment which we have in our pets. Kirk reasoned that "it is likely that even if a person has the ability to manage the habits of an animal, if they attribute the family pet's habits to the efforts of another person who trained the animal, instead of to the pet's own volitional action, their mental ownership of the pet might be moistened." So she generally reproduced the treatments used in the very first study, but instructed half of the individuals, "Now, for the rest of the study, envision that your animal had actually originally lived with somebody else. Picture that the animal's habits as you understand it is entirely the outcome of any training that somebody else did prior to you got the family pet." She likewise added 2 additional steps of the worth individuals place on their pet: one was how much the individual might spend for a tailored food bowl, and the second dealt with spending money to buy a painting of the pet.

Here the results once again were clear. If individuals felt that the control that they had over their animal's habits was due to someone else's training, they appeared to have weaker feelings of psychological ownership, and their psychological accessory to their family pet was lessened. Under those situations, they were also less happy to spend cash on their family pet's well-being or on items connected to their pet.